Prove it. Attack it yourself.

Every claim on this site is a button here, backed by the real running system โ€” a live database with row-level security, the real approval queue, the real kill switch. Not recordings.

๐Ÿ”’ the crown jewel ยท live

Try to breach tenant isolation. Watch it hold.

Two sandbox tenants, each with a private note. A shared tool, owned by Alpha, granted to Beta. When Beta calls it โ€” even asking explicitly for Alpha's data โ€” Postgres returns nothing, because the tool runs under Beta's scope. Run live against a real database with row-level security and a NOBYPASSRLS role. Not a script โ€” hit the button.

tenant Bโ€” shared tool โ†’tenant A's data

B calls A's tool, asking explicitly for A's data.
Press Run โ€” watch RLS return zero rows.

โ›” governance ยท live

Watch a consequential action get governed.

Ask the sandbox to do something with stakes โ€” publish a public announcement (tier-3). It doesn't just run. It's classified, checked against the kill switch, and parked for a human. Authorize, then act. Flip the kill switch and watch tier-3 refuse before it can even queue.

kill switch
tier-3โ†’approval queueโ†’human

It doesn't run โ€” it queues. Send one, then approve or reject.
Flip the kill switch to halt it before it can even queue.

eval ยท live ยท ~15s

The audit, reproducible. Run it yourself.

A governance eval โ€” adversarial cases scored pass/fail against the real assistant and the live sandbox, right now. Not a badge; a button. Same shape as the 35-agent audit that hardened it: probe, then verify.

5 adversarial cases
isolation ยท governance ยท safety ยท injection ยท honesty

Scored pass/fail against the live system. Press Run.

Built solo. Running in production. Open to the right team.

If governed, multi-tenant agent infrastructure is the problem you're solving โ€” let's talk.